People underestimate the power of influence of those in an authoritative
position. Most people do not realize that
they too can be persuaded to do things that they would normally not do under
the right circumstances. We would all
like to think we would do the right thing but these studies show us
otherwise. We are
doomed to repeat history if we do not remember the past. We need to teach our children to be free
thinkers and not to blindly obey those in authority over us. They should respect but question and learn to
trust their gut instinct of what is right and wrong. I recall seeing a bumper sticker as a young
girl and it has stuck with me all these years, it simply read, “Question
authority.” Up until that point in time
it had never occurred to me that that was even an option. I was taught as a
child to obey those over me. It was a
light bulb moment for me. There are many
lessons to be learned and remember from these studies but one of the most
important I think is to never degrade or demoralize yourself by following the instructions
of someone else. Always make sure that
the decisions you make are decisions you can live with for the rest of your
life.
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Blog post #7
I have flown a total of three times in my life. I hate it.
I hate everything about it. Each
time reaffirms even more why I hate. I
think I am going to die every time I fly. My first experience flying was a work related
trip to Florida. My phobia at this time
was not near as strong as it is now. I
think it is stronger due to the fact I know what to expect and back then I did
not. We recently took a trip to Disney World. I had the bright idea to fly out of Weyers
Cave airport so we would get free parking (inside joke) and be just fifteen
minutes away from home. I knew it was
going to be a smaller plane and I was ok with that. I had ridden a similar one on my first
trip. I should have known what to expect
by the writing on the side of the plane.
“Begin with the end in mind” was scrawled beautifully across the front
side of the plane so as you entered you could not miss it. Not the sort of thing you want to read on the
side of your plane, it might be ok if you are reading the Stephen Covey book on
the plane. But, not on the plane that is
carrying my body. It was a horrible ride
with what my husband called “mild turbulence.”
I told him if that was mild I don’t want to ever feel major
turbulence. I thought for sure I was
going to have a panic attack. The
stewardess kept coming back to check on me, I must have been as white as a
sheet. I know my knuckles were white as I
was digging into the chair arms and holding on for dear life. The book says generalized anxiety disorders
mellow around age 50, I don’t see that happening.
Friday, May 31, 2013
Blog post #6
An eye witness to a crime can be swayed by suggestive
language either by other witnesses or also by law enforcement officers that can
create memory construction. Their
testimony can also be wrong due to stress especially if the perpetrator is
carrying a weapon. Their focus is more intent on the weapon that they are not
really focusing on the person in front of them.
Some witnesses feel compelled or intimidated to
identify a perpetrator that they may incorrectly pick someone even if they are
not completely sure due to the pressure. The professor incorporated false
memories for some in the class when he made the suggestion that the burglar had
a strong chin.
I think that jurors will still probably on eyewitness
testimony especially if it is accompanied by other compelling evidence. I think it is just human nature to believe
that someone could not identify the person that was standing before them. The
percentage of those that identified incorrectly was low enough that with the
other evidence they should feel comfortable with the identification as with the
woman at the end of the video.
In the Lost Daughter I think that for Donna the power of
suggestion, her trust in the professionals and the desire to please others was
so overwhelming that sadly being so young and impressionable she succumbed to
the pressure placed on her by the therapist.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Blog post #5
A few weeks ago I attended the Richmond Science Museum with
my daughter. As soon as I read the
shaping behavior text I knew exactly what my blog would be about. One of the attractions at the museum was “rat
basketball.” Yes you heard me right, rat
basketball. The lady in charge explained
exactly how they taught the rats to play.
I wish now I had listened more intently.
I do recall her saying that it took a few weeks and went very slow even
though they used continuous reinforcement.
The training was done in several
small stages using food as a positive reinforcer. Once the rats mastered one skill they moved
onto the next step. Soon the rat learned
to associate putting the ball though the hoop with getting food. This is an example of operant conditioning
and is similar to the example in the book where the rat steps on the bar to get
food. The trainer did say that not all
of the rats were successful at associating their behavior with getting a
treat. Their training was stopped after
several unsuccessful attempts. I guess in this instance of the law of effect the
favorable consequence was not enough to alter the rats behavior.
The first link below is a YouTube of the rats playing basketball and the second link is of dogs learning to drive.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Blog post #4
I think John Q was definitely emotionally justified for his
actions. However, as a parent I do not
think his actions were morally justifiable.
What parent hasn’t wanted to right a wrong done to their child? But what a world of chaos we would live in if
we all practiced this type of vigilantly justice. I did not have a clear understanding if by
putting the son’s name on the list if this would then bump the next legitimate
person down. If so then this would make his actions even more wrong in my eyes
because he has just affected another innocent person’s life.
Although I was
cheering for him during the movie I would have to say that I definitely would be
classified as having the conventional stage of thinking. What he did was against the law. At the point he decided to break the law his
moral compass was similar to the hospital and insurance companies. He did not have the right to traumatize the
people in the hospital as he did; they were as innocent as his son. The officer that he injured and ridiculed was
only doing this job to protect the people. I am unable to justify his actions even when I
try to view it from the postconventional perspective. He was not doing something that was his right
or that was based on an ethical principle. He was acting merely on emotion and adrenalin.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Blog #3
I have had the good fortune to have three beautiful children. Two are from my previous marriage. They are 25
and 30 years old, my first born was a son and the baby was a girl and she
remained the baby for some 17 years.
I would definitely say that as a young mother
in her twenties (I just gave away my age, didn’t I?) I parented using the
authoritarian style and very often used the phrase “because I said so.” Ours was a single parent household. Looking back now I can see that I was probably
too strict at times. My decision on my
parenting style came from two major factors. I came from a household where there were
really no rules but desperately wanted and needed them as a child. Secondly being
a single mother of a boy I feared losing control of him as he grew up.
I wish the book had gone into a little more depth on the participants
of the case studies. Although correlation is not causation there just seems to
be way too many variable to draw any conclusions. My two oldest are like day and night. My son who is now a Marine has never suffered
from low self esteem or lacked in social skills. This was probably due to the
fact he was a very handsome young man and played many sports. By the time my daughter came along my
parenting style had relaxed to a degree.
However, she does suffer low self esteem and social skills. I would contribute this more to the relationship
she had with her father than from any parenting style.
As I said earlier seventeen years later and a second
marriage baby girl number three arrived.
I definitely take the authoritative parenting style with her. My husband on the other hand is very permissive
with her. This is his first child and he
is wound very tightly around her little finger. My husband is from a different culture and to
be honest I am not sure if this style is cultural or just his style. We have our own little case study going
on. My husband is taking the
naturalistic observation approach. Pun
intended.
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Blog post #2
I found the Secrets of
the Mind very interesting and mind boggling. I did not quite understand how
the doctor felt so sure of his findings after so little experimentation. Especially in the case of the man with pain
in the phantom clinched fist. I wondered
why Dr. Ramachandran did not possibly consider this to be some type of placebo
effect. Did the pain disappear due to his experiment actually working or
because the man was under a false impression that it would heal him?
It was surprising to
find that the sensors in the brain are not mapped in a particular order as our
bodies are put together and when a limb is lost the sensor is re-mapped to the
one closest. This explained why the man felt pain in his phantom arm when he
shaved, the lost limb sensor was absorbed by the nearest sensory which happened
to be his face.
I think that we can rewire our brains. Through positive reinforcement we can retrain
ourselves to react positively to a situation that we would normally have
reacted to negatively. With continued effort we can become more positive and
happy individuals by changing our thought process. I think for this to happen
you have to be very strong minded individual and believe that the change is
actually possible because in the end most people do not change.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSYloa6QqJoWednesday, May 15, 2013
Blog Post #1
I
have always found the topic of nature versus nurture very interesting. My
father was an alcoholic and I and my two siblings could be poster children for
the nurture side of the argument, but each in our own way. If you think about either side for too long
you can quite convince yourself that they are both correct. The Bible teaches
that we are all born in sin which gives credence to the side of nature.
However, Scientologists believe that we are all born innocent and our life
experiences within the world shape who we become. I think that there is no
denying that genetics plays a factor into our intelligence. However, nature could be overwritten by a
mother who did drugs while pregnant. If
the child was born and later had learning disabilities one could conclude that
the cause was the influence of the drugs on the fetus. This does not prove
causation was the reason only that a cause and effect relationship exists. As
time goes on and more studies are done it is becoming ever more evident that
both nature and nurture go hand in hand. That is what I think anyway; chalk it
up to my hindsight bias. There will always be examples that weigh heavier on
one side than the other but these are nothing more than random events.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/nature-versus-nurture-revisited.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/nature-versus-nurture-revisited.html
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)